Article
Kyungpook Mathematical Journal 2020; 60(4): 731-752
Published online December 31, 2020
Copyright © Kyungpook Mathematical Journal.
The p-deformed Generalized Humbert Polynomials and Their Properties
Rajesh V. Savalia*, B. I. Dave
Department of Mathematical Sciences, P. D. Patel Institute of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Charotar University of Science and Technology, Changa-388 421, DistAnand, Gujarat, India
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara-390 002, Gujarat, India
e-mail: rajeshsavalia.maths@charusat.ac.in
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara-390 002, Gujarat, India
e-mail: bidavemsu@yahoo.co.in
Received: September 10, 2019; Revised: July 29, 2020; Accepted: August 4, 2020
Abstract
We introduce the p-deformation of generalized Humbert polynomials. For these polynomials, we derive the differential equation, generating function relations, Fibonacci-type representations, and recurrence relations and state the companion matrix. These properties are illustrated for certain polynomials belonging to p-deformed generalized Humbert polynomials.
Keywords: p-Gamma function, p-Pochhammer symbol, differential equation, generating function relations, mixed relations
1. Introduction
In 2007, Díaz and Pariguan introduced the one-parameter deformation of the classical gamma function in the form [7]:
where
in which
For
This may be regarded as the
Our objective is to extend generalized Humbert polynomials according to Gould [9] by involving a new parameter:
The companion matrix of the monic polynomial is defined as follows.
Definition 1.1.
Let
We have the following lemma [14, Proposition 1.5.14, p.39].
Lemma 1.1.
If
The class
Definition 1.2.
For
where γ,
This class of polynomials is generated by the following relation:
The substitution
Apart from the polynomials (1.4), according to Humbert [12, p. 75],
and
where
Definition 1.3.
For
in which the floor function
We call these polynomials
For
For
The
Further, if
All these polynomials reduce to their classical forms when
2. Differential Equation
In this section, we derive the differential equation of the polynomial (1.5). Costa et al. [4] demonstrated that the homogeneous differential equation:
has a polynomial solution if and only if
Let the sequence
We use the forward difference operator
The relation between Δ and
to obtain the alternative form:
The differential equation for this explicit form is derived in Theorem 2.1.
where
Hence,
Next, we have
where
Substituting the equation (2.3) and (2.4) on the left-hand side of the differential equation (2.2) and comparing the corresponding coefficients of
where
Because
By substituting
that is,
Hence,
For
As
2.1. Particular Cases
We illustrate special instances of the differential equation (2.2). In particular, the equations of the Pincherle, Gegenbauer, and Legendre polynomials. We choose
and
By choosing
Further, after entering
that is,
we obtain the following equation:
The choice
Next, to obtain the equation for the
or equivalently,
From (2.9), (2.10) and (2.11), we have the following:
With
where
of the
3. Generating Function Relations
We derive GFR of the
where
where
To derive (3.1), we take
The same substitution on the right-hand side of the Lagrange's series gives the following:
This completes the proof.
We define the function as follows:
which is required in deriving the following GFR.
For
where
In view of the sum in (3.1), the inner series simplifies to the following:
where
This completes the proof of GFR (3.3).
The replacement of γ with
in (3.3), yield the GFR of the
where
We note that
This generalizes the GFR (1.3).
The GFR of the
where
The case
This extends the GFR according to Humbert [11, p.24] (also see [15, Eq.(1.15), p.5] with
The GFR of the
where
The GFR of the
where
Similarly, taking
where
which is the GFR of the
with
3.1. Fibonacci-type Polynomials
We provide a computation formula of Fibonacci-type polynomials of order
Comparing the coefficients of
The GFR (3.6) leads to the computation formula of Fibonacci-type polynomials of order
4. Recurrence Relations
In this section, the differential recurrence relations and mixed relations of the
First, we denote
Then, with
Setting
The successive differentiation yields the following:
and in general,
Next, taking the
However, because,
from (4.3), we have the following:
Inserting
Replacing
that is,
where
This provides the
From this, it follows that
This generalizes the formula given by Gould [9, Eq.(3.5), p.702](cf. with
involving the
involving the
For the recurrence relations, we first obtain the following:
From (4.1), we have the following:
Simplifying this and abbreviating
because
This identity provides the
Taking derivative of (3.5) with respect to
and differentiating (3.5) with respect to
Thus, we obtain
After equating the coefficients of
This provides a
5. Companion Matrix
Let
where
Then, with this
where
Thus, the companion matrix is as follows:
where the eigen values are determined from the following determinant equation:
From this, we obtain the eigen values
Acknowledgements.
The authors express their sincere thanks to the reviewers and the editor-in-chief for their valuable suggestions for the improvement of the manuscript.
References
- Yu. A. Brychkov, On some properties of the Nuttall function Qμ, ν(a,b), Integral Transforms Spec. Funct., 25(1)(2014), 33-43.
- Yu. A. Brychkov and N. V. Savischenko, A special function of communication theory, Integral Transforms Spec. Funct., 26(6)(2015), 470-484.
- V. V. Bytev, M. Yu. Kalmykov and S.-O. Moch, HYPERDIRE: HYPERgeometric functions DIfferential REduction: MATHEMATICA based packages for differential reduction of generalized hypergeometric functions: FD and FS Horn-type hypergeo-metric functions of three variables, Comput Phys. Commun., 185(2014), 3041-3058.
- G. B. Costa and L. E. Levine, Nth-order differential equations with finite polynomial solutions, Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Tech., 29(6)(1998), 911-914.
- P. Deligne, P. Etingof, D. S. Freed, L. C. Jeffrey, D. Kazhdan, J. W. Morgan, D. R. Morrison and E. Witten, Quantum fields and strings: a course for mathematicians, American Mathematical Society, 1999.
- R. Diaz and E. Pariguan, Quantum symmetric functions, Comm. Algebra, 33(6)(2005), 1947-1978.
- R. Diaz and E. Pariguan, On hypergeometric functions and Pochhammer k-symbol, Divulg. Mat., 15(2)(2007), 179-192.
- R. Diaz and C. Teruel, q; k-generalized gamma and beta function, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys., 12(1)(2005), 118-134.
- H. W. Gould, Inverse series relations and other expansions involving Humbert polynomials, Duke Math. J., 32(4)(1965), 697-711.
- F. B. Hildebrand, Introduction to numerical analysis, Second edition, Dover Publications INC., New York, 1987.
- P. Humbert, Some extensions of Pincherle's polynomials, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc., 39(1)(1920), 21-24.
- P. Humbert, The conuent hypergeometric functions of two variables, Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., 41(1922), 73-96.
- B. A. Kniehl and O. V. Tarasov, Finding new relationships between hypergeometric functions by evaluating Feynman integrals, Nuclear Phys. B, 854(3)(2012), 841-852.
- M. Mignotte and D. Stefanescu, Polynomials: an algorithmic approach, Springer- Verlag, New York, 1999.
- G. Ozdemir, Y. Simsek, and G. V. Milovanović, Generating functions for special poly- nomials and numbers including Apostol-type and Humbert-type polynomials, Mediterr. J. Math., 14(3)(2017), Paper No. 117, 17 pp.
- G. PÓlya and G. Szegő, Problems and theorems in analysis I, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg and Berlin, 1972.
- E. D. Rainville, Special functions, The Macmillan Company, New York, 1960.
- P. C. Sofotasios , T. A. Tsiftsis, Yu. A. Brychkov, et al., Analytic expressions and bounds for special functions and applications in communication theory, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 60(12)(2014), 7798-7823.
- H. M. Srivastava and H. L. Manocha, A treatise on generating functions, Ellis Hor- wood Limited, John Willey and Sons, 1984.
- E. T. Whittaker and G. N. Watson, A course of modern analysis, 4th ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1927.