Table. 3. Table 3

The comparative results for for different given parameters, where ϵ=10−3.

Alg. 3.2			SEA			AGRA
λk	Iter.	CPU-time	τk	Iter.	CPU-time	¯λk	Iter.	CPU
1500L+1	1	0.4375	1k+1	1	0.2344	φ2k+3	39	18.3438
14L+1	47	16.2969	15	26	5.875	φ20k15+50	32	16.4844
110L+1	77	22.2969	150	111	26.0781	φ30k12+30	51	26.6406
1L+10	55	16.6563	1100	151	61.8906	φ5k12+30	79	39.7969
1L+1	24	7.1719	1100+k	12	43.5313	φk12+3	35	16.8125
1100L+1	123	34.1719	150+k	101	35.4375	φ5k+20	79	54.4688
12L2+1	47	14.7656	15+k	44	14.9219	φ5k+1	68	38.8281
12L5+1	133	40.2031	15+k2	15	5.6406	φ3k3+20	77	40.9063
120L15+1	83	28	120+k5	5	1.4531	φ4k3+15	74	41.9844
1L12+8	48	15.4844	120+k12	72	25.5313	φ(5k3+1)13	5	2.8125
1L15+5	37	16.7188	120+k15	68	21.4219	φ(5k12+30)12	43	21.9219

Kyungpook Mathematical Journal 2022;62:533~555 https://doi.org/10.5666/KMJ.2022.62.3.533

© KYUNGPOOK Math. J.