Table. 3. Table 3

Example 4.1, Comparison of maximum absolute error.

ε↓	N=24	25	26	27	28	29
	Proposed	Scheme
2-12	7.0588e-03	8.6985e-04	6.4050e-05	4.0017e-06	2.5010e-07	1.5632e-08
2-16	6.6543e-03	8.1752e-04	8.4387e-05	7.8780e-06	6.8770e-07	5.7247e-08
2-20	7.0588e-03	8.6985e-04	8.4387e-05	7.8536e-06	6.6828e-07	5.5642e-08
2-25	7.0588e-03	8.6985e-04	8.4387e-05	7.8536e-06	6.6828e-07	5.5642e-08
	Result	in [8]
2-12	4.245e-03	1.957e-03	5.262e-04	1.227e-04	3.012e-05	7.496e-06
2-16	1.302e-03	1.292e-03	1.061e-03	4.893e-04	1.315e-04	3.068e-05
2-20	3.255e-04	3.255e-04	3.255e-04	3.231e-04	2.653e-04	1.223e-04
2-25	5.754e-05	5.754e-05	5.754e-05	5.754e-05	5.754e-05	5.752e-05

Kyungpook Mathematical Journal 2021;61:591~612 https://doi.org/10.5666/KMJ.2021.61.3.591

© KYUNGPOOK Math. J.