검색
Article Search

JMB Journal of Microbiolog and Biotechnology

OPEN ACCESS eISSN 0454-8124
pISSN 1225-6951
QR Code

Article

Kyungpook Mathematical Journal 2020; 60(1): 177-183

Published online March 31, 2020

Copyright © Kyungpook Mathematical Journal.

The Critical Point Equation on 3-dimensional α-cosymplectic Manifolds

Adara M. Blaga*, Chiranjib Dey

Department of Mathematics, West University of Timişoara, Bld. V. Pârvan nr. 4, 300223, Timişoara, România
e-mail : adarablaga@yahoo.com
Dhamla Jr. High School, Vill-Dhamla, P.O.-Kedarpur, Dist-Hooghly, Pin-712406, West Bengal, India
e-mail : dey9chiranjib@gmail.com

Received: March 21, 2019; Accepted: June 25, 2019

The object of the present paper is to study the critical point equation (CPE) on 3-dimensional α-cosymplectic manifolds. We prove that if a 3-dimensional connected α-cosymplectic manifold satisfies the Miao-Tam critical point equation, then the manifold is of constant sectional curvature −α2, provided ≠ (ξλ)ξ. We also give several interesting corollaries of the main result.

Keywords: critical point equation, 3-dimensional α-cosymplectic manifolds

In [4], Miao-Tam studied the volume functional on the space of constant scalar curvature metrics with a given boundary metric. They derived a necessary and sufficient condition for a metric to be a critical point as follows:

On a compact Riemannian manifold (Mn, g), n ≥ 3, with smooth boundary, if there exists a non-zero smooth function λ : Mn → ℝ (called potential function) such that

Hessλ=(Δλ)g-λS=g   on   Mn

and λ = 0 on ∂Mn, where Δ is the Laplacian operator, Hess is the Hessian operator and S is the Ricci tensor with respect to the metric g, then g is said to satisfy the Miao-Tam critical condition.

In particular, if the potential function λ is a non-zero constant, then (1.1) is just an Einstein metric. Recently, Hwang [2] proved that the CPE conjecture is also true under certain condition on the bounds of the potential function λ. In 2017, Wang [8] proved that if the metric of a 3-dimensional (k, μ)′-almost Kenmotsu manifold satisfies the Miao-Tam critical condition, then the manifold is locally isometric either to the hyperbolic space ℍ3(−1) or to the Riemannian product ℍ2(−4)×ℝ. In [7], Ghosh and Patra considered the CPE in the framework of K-contact manifolds and (k, μ)-contact manifolds.

Motivated by the above studies, in the present paper we study 3-dimensional α-cosymplectic manifolds admitting CPE, i.e. satisfying the relation (1.1). The paper is organized as follows. In section 2, we recall the definition of α-cosymplectic manifolds and some basic formulas and section 3 is devoted to prove our main result, precisely:

Theorem 1.1

If a 3-dimensional connected α-cosymplectic manifold (M,φ, ξ, η, g, α) satisfies CPE, then the manifold is of constant sectional curvatureα2, provided Dλ ≠ (ξλ)ξ, where D denotes the gradient operator with respect to g.

An almost contact metric structure on a (2n+1)-dimensional smooth manifold M consists of a 1-form η, a vector field ξ (called the Reeb field), a (1, 1)-tensor field φ and a Riemannian metric g satisfying the following conditions:

η(ξ)=1,         φ2=-I+ηξ

and

g(φX,φY)=g(X,Y)-η(X)η(Y),

for any X, Yχ(M). The above relations imply

ηφ=0,         φξ=0,g(X,φY)=-g(φX,Y),         g(X,ξ)=η(X),

for any X, Yχ(M).

An almost contact metric structure is said to be normal if the induced almost complex structure J on the product manifold M × ℝ defined by

J(X,fddt):=(φX-fξ,η(X)ddt)

is integrable, where Xχ(M), t is the coordinate on ℝ and f is a smooth function on M × ℝ.

An almost contact metric structure is said to be a contact metric structure if

g(X,φY)=dη(X,Y),

for any X, Yχ(M). In this case, the 1-form η is called the contact metric form. We define a (1, 1)-tensor field h by h:=12£ξφ, where £ denotes the Lie derivative in the direction of the vector field ξ. It is symmetric and satisfies = −φh. Also, we have Tr.h = Tr.φh = 0, = 0 and

Xξ=-φX-φhX,

for any Xχ(M), where ∇ is the Levi-Civita connection of g.

An almost contact metric manifold is called Kenmotsu if

(Xφ)Y=g(φX,Y)ξ-η(Y)φX,

for any X, Yχ(M).

In 2005, Kim and Pak [3] introduced the notion of almost α-cosymplectic manifold, which is an almost contact metric manifold that satisfies = 0 and dΦ = 2αη ∧ Φ, for α a real number. Recently, Erken [1] and Öztürk et. al [5, 6] obtained some fundamental properties of almost α-cosymplectic manifolds. An α-cosymplectic manifold is a normal almost α-cosymplectic manifold. An α-cosymplectic manifold with α = 0 is a cosymplectic manifold and with α = 1, it is a Kenmotsu manifold.

On a (2n + 1)-dimensional α-cosymplectic manifold M, for any X, Yχ(M), the following relations hold:

Xξ=α[X-η(X)ξ],R(X,Y)ξ=α2[η(X)Y-η(Y)X],S(X,ξ)=-2nα2η(X),Qξ=-2nα2ξ.

Before proving our main result, we recall the following lemma, given by Miao-Tam.

Lemma 3.1. ([4, Theorem 7])

If the metric of a connected Riemannian manifold satisfies the Miao-Tam critical condition, then the scalar curvature is constant.

It is known that the Riemannian curvature tensor of a 3-dimensional Riemannian manifold (M,g) is given by:

R(X,Y)Z=g(Y,Z)QX-g(X,Z)QY+S(Y,Z)X-S(X,Z)Y-r2[g(Y,Z)X-g(X,Z)Y],

for any X, Y, Zχ(M), where S is the Ricci tensor, Q is the Ricci operator and r is the scalar curvature.

Assume that (M,φ, ξ, η, g,α) is a 3-dimensional connected α-cosymplectic manifold which satisfies the Miao-Tam critical condition, i.e. which satisfies (1.1). Putting Y = Z = ξ in (3.1) and using (2.9), (2.10) and (2.11), the Ricci operator can be written as

QX=(α2+r2)X-(3α2+r2)η(X)ξ,

for any Xχ(M).

Taking covariant derivative of the above equation with respect to Y and using (2.7) and Lemma 3.1, we obtain

(YQ)X=-α(3α2+r2)[g(X,Y)ξ+η(X)Y-2η(X)η(Y)ξ],

for any X, Yχ(M).

Taking trace of the equation (1.1), we have

Δλ=-12(rλ+3).

Using (3.4) in (1.1), we obtain

XDλ=λQX+fX,         wheref=-12(rλ+1),

for any Xχ(M), where D denotes the gradient operator with respect to g.

Taking the covariant derivative of (3.5) with respect to Y, we get

YXDλ=(Yλ)QX+λYQX+(Yf)X+fYX,

for any X, Yχ(M).

Similarly, we get

XYDλ=(Xλ)QY+λXQY+(Xf)Y+fXY.

Also

[X,Y]Dλ=λQ[X,Y]+f[X,Y],

and using (3.6), (3.7) and (3.8) we have

R(X,Y)Dλ=XYDλ-YXDλ-[X,Y]Dλ=(Xλ)QY-(Yλ)QX+λ[(XQ)Y-(YQ)X]+(Xf)Y-(Yf)X.

In view of (3.3) and (3.9) yields

R(X,Y)Dλ=(Xλ)QY-(Yλ)QX+λα(3α2+r2)[η(X)Y-η(Y)X]+(Xf)Y-(Yf)X,

for any X, Yχ(M).

By setting X = ξ in the above equation and using (2.10) and (3.2) we get

R(ξ,Y)Dλ=(ξλ)[(α2+r2)Y-(3α2+r2)η(Y)ξ]+2α2(Yλ)ξ+λα(3α2+r2)[Y-η(Y)ξ]+(ξf)Y-(Yf)ξ.

Taking inner product with ξ in the above equation, we easily compute

g(R(ξ,Y)ξ,Dλ)=2α2[(ξλ)η(Y)-(Yλ)]-(ξf)η(Y)+(Yf).

On the other hand, from (2.9) we have

g(R(ξ,Y)ξ,Dλ)=α2[g(Y,Dλ)-η(Y)η(Dλ)].

Making use of (3.12) and (3.13) we get

α2[g(Y,Dλ)-η(Y)η(Dλ)]=2α2[(ξλ)η(Y)-(Yλ)]-(ξf)η(Y)+(Yf).

Removing Y from both sides in the above equation, we obtain

2α2(ξλ)ξ-(ξf)ξ+Df=α2[3Dλ-η(Dλ)ξ].

From f=-12(rλ+1), we get

Df=-r2(Dλ)   and   ξf=-r2(ξλ).

Using the above relations in (3.15) we easily have

(3α2+r2)[(ξλ)ξ-Dλ]=0.

If = (ξλ)ξ, then taking the covariant derivative with respect to X and using (3.5) we obtain

λQX-12(rλ+1)X=X(ξλ)ξ+α(ξλ)[X-η(X)ξ].

Then taking trace we get

ξ(ξλ)=-2α(ξλ)-12(rλ+3).

From (1.1) we get

XDλ=(Δλ)X+λQX+X,

hence, for X = ξ, together with (3.4) and (2.11) imply

ξDλ=-12(4α2λ+rλ+1)ξ.

Since ∇ξ = ξ(ξλ)ξ, we deduce that

ξ(ξλ)=-12(4α2λ+rλ+1)

which together with (3.18) imply

α2λ-α(ξλ)-12=0.

Then we can state:

Proposition 3.1

If a 3-dimensional connected α-cosymplectic manifold (M,φ, ξ, η, g,α) satisfies CPE and r ≠ −6α2, then the gradient of λ is collinear with ξ. Moreover

(ξλ)=αλ-12α.

Corollary 3.1

If a 3-dimensional connected α-cosymplectic manifold (M,φ, ξ, η, g, α) satisfies CPE and r ≠ −6α2, then it can not be a cosymplectic manifold.

If 3α2+r2=0, then r = −6α2. Putting the value of r = −6α2 in (3.1) and in view of (3.2), we find that manifold is of constant sectional curvature −α2.

Hence we can state the following:

Theorem 3.1

If a 3-dimensional connected α-cosymplectic manifold (M,φ, ξ, η, g, α) satisfies CPE, then the manifold is of constant sectional curvatureα2, provided Dλ ≠ (ξλ)ξ, where D denotes the gradient operator with respect to g.

If α = 0, then the manifold is a cosymplectic manifold and we have the following:

Corollary 3.2

If a 3-dimensional connected cosymplectic manifold (M,φ, ξ, η, g) satisfies CPE, then the manifold is flat, provided Dλ ≠ (ξλ)ξ.

If α = 1, then the manifold is a Kenmotsu manifold and we have the following:

Corollary 3.3

If a 3-dimensional connected Kenmotsu manifold (M,φ, ξ, η, g) satisfies CPE, then the manifold is locally isometric to the hyperbolic space H3(−1), provided Dλ ≠ (ξλ)ξ.

  1. IK. Erken. On a classification of almost α-cosymplectic manifolds. Khayyam J Math., 5(2019), 1-10.
  2. S. Hwang. Critical points of the total scalar curvature functionals on the space of metrics of constant scalar curvature. Manuscripta Math., 103(2000), 135-142.
    CrossRef
  3. TW. Kim, and HK. Pak. Canonical foliations of certain classes of almost contact metric structures. Acta Math Sin (Engl Ser)., 21(4)(2005), 841-846.
    CrossRef
  4. P. Miao, and L-F. Tam. On the volume functional of compact manifolds with boundary with constant scalar curvature. Calc Var Partial Differ Equ., 36(2009), 141-171.
    CrossRef
  5. H. Öztürk, N. Aktan, and C. Murathan. Almost α-cosymplectic (k, μ, v)-spaces., arXiv:1007.0527 [math. DG].
  6. H. Öztürk, C. Murathan, N. Aktan, and A. Turgut Vanh. Almost α-cosymplectic f-manifolds. An Ştiinţ Univ Al I Cuza Iasi Mat (NS)., 60(1)(2014), 211-226.
  7. DS. Patra, and A. Ghosh. Certain contact metric satisfying the Miao-Tam critical condition. Ann Polon Math., 116(3)(2016), 263-271.
  8. Y. Wang, and W. Wang. An Einstein-like metric on almost Kenmotsu manifolds. Filomat., 31(15)(2017), 4695-4702.
    CrossRef